Individualized cardiac resynchronization therapy: current status

• Ruwald Martin Huth
• N. Bruun

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has shown a substantial reduction in heart failure patient morbidity and mortality, with improvement in quality of life as well as symptoms. The therapy is, however, limited to approximately 10 % – 15 % of heart failure patients and, typi cally, 30 % do not derive benefit from the device. For optimal outcomes with CRT, the correct selection of patients is of paramount importance. The first parameter is depressed left ventricular systolic function, and the second is a wide QRS complex. Different nuances among clinical tri als have rendered guidelines pragmatic and compromising, but also conflicting and confusing. A large proportion of real-life CRTs are implanted in patients where the evidence for benefit is scarce or not present. Further, for optimal benefit, patients require evidence-directed medi cal therapy at maximal doses, effective placement of ventricular leads, and high biventricular pacing percentages, along with optimized atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular interval device programming. These items, as well as specific clinical characteristics, such as AV block and atrial fibrillation, in the context of CRT indications, are discussed. This review focuses on these issues to guide the clinician through guidelines, with an evidence-based update on the current status of CRT.

Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology. – 2014. – Vol. 5. – P. 305–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRCC.S50541

Keywords:cardiac resynchronization therapy, prognosis, review, biventricular pacing, guide line, indications