References
1. Bello S., Peng E., Sarkar P. Conduits for coronary artery bypass surgery: the quest for second best. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2011; 12: 411–21.
2. Bockeria L.A. Cardiovascular Surgery. Diseases and congenital anomalies of the circulatory system. Moscow; 2023. (in Russian)
3. Petrosyan K.V., Merzlyakov V. Yu., Karaev A.V., Gurdzibeev A.B. Functional methods for assessing coronary blood flow as a predictor of ITA – LAD bypass graft failure after CABG surgery. Creative cardiology. 2022; 16 (4): 497–507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24022/1997-3187-2022-16-4-497-507 (in Russian)
4. Pijls N., Fearon W., Tonino P. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56: 177–84.
5. Bockeria L.A., Pursanov M.G., Petrosyan K.V., Sobolev A.V., Vartanov P.V., Bockeria O.L., Donakanyan S.A., Golubev E.P., Karaev A.V.,Losev V.V. Intraoperative bypass angiography: an optimal solution in determination of coronary bypass graft patience and improvement of long-termresults of surgical myocardial revascularization. Grudnaya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya [Russian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery]. 2018; 60 (3): 233–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24022/0236-2791-2018-60-3-233-241 (in Russian)
6. Loop F.D., Lytle B.W., Cosgrove D.M. Influence of the internal mammary artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986; 314: 1–6.
7. Cameron A.А. J. Internal thoracic artery grafts: 20-year clinical follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25: 188–92.
8. Tatoulis J. Patencies of 2127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004; 77: 93–101.
9. Taggart D.P., Altman D.G., Gray A.M. Randomized trial of bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 2540–9.
10. Nakajima H., Kobayashi J., Toda K., et al. A10-year angiographic follow-up of competitive flow in sequential and composite arterial grafts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011; 40: 399–404.
11. Mohsin I., Namburu L., Sadiq Z., Newberry B., Habeeb M. Figures save share reprints request competitive flow: closure of internal thoracic artery graft after successful coronary artery bypass graft surgery. CJC Open. 2021; 11 (3): 1406–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2021.06.017
12. Davies P. Hemodynamic shear stress and the endothelium in cardiovascular pathophysiology. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2009; 6: 16–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio1397
13. Gaudino M., Antoniades C., Benedetto U., Deb S., Franco A., Giammarco G., et al. Mechanisms, consequences, and prevention of coronary graft failure; Atlantic (Arterial Grafting International Consortium) Alliance. Circulation. 2017; 136 (18): 1749–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/117.027597
14. Glineur D., Hanet C. Competitive flow and arterial graft a word of caution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg . 2012; 41 (4): 768–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezr064
15. Berger A., MacCarthy Р., Siebert U., Carlier S., Wijns W., Heyndrickx G., et al. Long-term patency of internal mammary artery bypass grafts: relationship with preoperative severity of the native coronary artery stenosis. Circulation. 2004; 110 (II): 36–40.
16. Bocharov A.V., Popov L.V. Competitive blood flow: definition, biophysical basis, mechanisms of occurrence in clinical practice, clinical and angiographic diagnostic criteria. Clinical Physiology of Circulation. 2021; 18 (2): 165–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24022/1814-6910-2021-18-2-165-171 (in Russian)