References
1. Garg A., Rout A., Raheja H., et al. Long-term follow-up of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 98 (3): 427–33. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29338
2. Izzo P., Macchi A., De Gennaro L., et al. Recurrent angina after coronary angioplasty: mechanisms, diagnosticand therapeutic options. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2012; 1 (2): 158–69.
3. Kamphuisen P.W. Thrombogenicity in patients with percutaneous coronary artery intervention and dual antiplatelet treatment. Eur Heart J. 2008; 29 (14): 1699–700.
4. Schulz B., Pruessmeyer J., Maretzky T., et al. ADAM10 regulates endothelial permeability and T-Cell transmigration by proteolysis of vascular endothelial cadherin. Circ Res. 2008; 102: 1192–201.
5. Siller-Matula J.M., Bayer G., Bergmeister H., et al. An experimental model to study isolated effects of thrombin in vivo. Thromb Res 2010; 126: 454–61.
6. Ku D.D., Zaleski J.K. Receptor mechanism of thrombin-induced endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary vascular effects in dogs. J. Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1993; 22: 609–16.
7. Binder B.R. Thrombin is bad, accepted; but is smoking good to prevent restenosis? J Thromb Haemost. 2006; 4 (10): 2188–90.
8. Hemker H.C., Giesen P., Dier R.Al., et al. Саlibrаtеd аutоmаtеd thrоmbin gеnеrаtiоn mеаsurеmеnt in clоtting рlаsmа. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 2003; 33: 4–15.
9. Dargaud Y., Trzeciak M.C., Bordet J.C., et al. Use of calibrated automated thrombinography +/- thrombomodulin to recognize the prothrombotic phenotype. Thromb Haemost. 2006; 96 (5): 562–7.
10. Berezovskaya G.A. Hemostasis disorders and the course of coronary heart disease after endovascular revascularization: Diss. SPb, 2019: 212 p. (in Russian)
11. Berezovskaya G.A., Lazovskaya T.V., Klokova E.S., et al. Method for predicting resumption of coronary heart disease clinical picture by means of neural networks in patients after endovascular intervention. Izobreteniya, poleznye modeli [Inventions, utility models]. 2018; 35. (in Russian)
12. Blagoveshchenskaya E.A., Ryabukhina V.V., Dashkina A.I., et al. Neural network methods for construction of sociodynamic models hierarchy. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2016; 9719: 513–20.
13. Filkin V., Kaverzneva T., Lazovskaya T., et al. Neural network modeling of conditions of destruction of wood plank based on measurements. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2016; Vol. 772: 012041. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/772/1/012041
14. Kaverzneva T., Lazovskaya T., Tarkhov D., et al. Neural network modeling of air pollution in tunnels according to indirect measurements. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 772. 2016: 012035. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/772/1/012035
15. Lazovskaya T.V., Tarkhov D.A., Berezovskaya G.A., et al. Possibilities of neural networks for personalization approaches for prevention of complications after endovascular interventions. In: Cong F., Leung A., Wei Q., eds. Advances in Neural Networks – ISNN 2017: 14th International Symposium, ISNN 2017, Sapporo, Hakodate, and Muroran, Hokkaido, Japan, June 21–26, 2017, Proceedings, Part I. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2017: 379–85. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59072-1-45
16. Attanasio M., Marcucci R., Gori A.M., et al. Residual thrombin potential predicts cardiovascular death in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Thromb. Res. 2016; 147: 52–7. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2016.09.020
17. Loeffеn R., Gоdschаlk T.C., vаn Оеrle R., еt al. Тhе hyреrсоаgulable рrоfile of раtients with stеnt thrоmbоsis. Hеаrt. 2015; 101 (14): 1126–32.
18. Souza C., Pizzolato E., Mendes R., et al. Artificial neural networks prognostic evaluation of post-surgery complications in patients underwent to coronary artery bypass graft surgery. International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, ICMLA 2009, Miami Beach, Florida, USA. 2009: 799–803. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2009.116
19. Bonde A., Varadarajan K.M., Bonde N., et al. Assessing the utility of deep neural networks in predicting postoperative surgical complications: a retrospective study. Lancet Digit Health. 2021; 3 (8): e471–e485. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00084-4